Recorded through October 20
- Competitors by category. ParkMobile is a provisional indirect alternative. Miner Metro is indirect. Arriving early and circling are status-quo alternatives. No direct competitor is confirmed.
- Six testable assumptions. A-01 through A-06 cover search time, app limits, shuttle use, habits, switching, and lot coverage. Listing them does not validate them or update the Sprint 2 register.
- Method and evidence log. The plan is eight interviews and three competitor tests. Six interviews support the current analysis. Other records, eligibility checks, and teardown notes are still open.
- Shuttle findings. Permit cost can be the main reason for shuttle use, with parking delays also contributing. A student without a car does not currently need parking information. Those cases qualify the shuttle assumption. They do not describe every shuttle user.
- Corrected interview reads. Downtown and San Francisco searches show payment use, not UTEP search times. Original answers stay in the record.
- Decisions held. The review narrowed the initial target group, finished the missing analysis, and clarified proposed risks. CR-01 stays with Saul Burns and CR-02 with Joe Mota. Scope and cost estimates are unchanged. Submission and the remaining research are not confirmed complete.
Document Change Log