Sprint 1 · Accountability

Contributions & AI

Who owned what on Damn Parking’s Sprint 1 portal and PM artifacts, and how generative AI was used under team review.

Contribution statement

MemberFocus
Joe MotaPortal / Product
Saul BurnsEngineering
David VasquezSoftware Engineering
Kevin LlamasSoftware Engineering

Attribution stays with these four teammates. Update this table if roles shift mid-semester.

AI use disclosure

Tool & stage

Cursor / generative AI assisted portal construction (layout, Three.js lot visualization, page scaffolding) and produced initial drafts of Sprint 1 PM artifacts for team review.

What the team changed or rejected

  • Rejected framing Damn Parking as a payment/reservation marketplace (kept occupancy intelligence).
  • Rewrote market “top pick” to emphasize camera reuse and dual driver/ops value; cut generic smart-city filler.
  • Tightened charter out-of-scope (no enforcement LPR, no production camera access without approval).
  • Go/no-go style justifications for later sprints will remain human-owned per syllabus; individual memos/reflections are never AI-authored.

Document Contributions & AI

Damn Parking · Sprint 1 Contributions

Sprint: 1 · Purpose: Contribution statement and AI disclosure for the Living Project Portal deliverable.

Download PDF